The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable websites providing both complimentary casino-style games and financially rewarding prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to discuss claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as traditional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of unlawful gaming in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of celebrities from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any distinctions between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - however not all - video games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others lure clients with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's cars, airplanes and estates before pivoting to footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The discrepancy in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting totally free.

'Most social sweeps clients never buy,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social casinos use customers a chance to play casino-style video games with friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be utilized to open various functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting consumers to acquire other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad revealing off Drake's cars, planes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online casinos are banned in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to fuel the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need generally require identification. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable clients to send mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, provided the gamers follow painfully specific directions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, consequently providing them a factor to try their hands at any variety of casino video games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win rewards. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important distinction in between social sweeps and traditional online gambling sites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the possibility to win financially rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself does not fulfill the definition of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all kinds of daily organizations in the United States, everything from hamburgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, thus suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the attributes commonly related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payout percentage for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the profits made by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet coffee shops that sprang up in Florida, offering clients the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Much of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face similar scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as crucial consider determining that a sweepstakes promo was in fact a guise for illegal gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and earnings opportunities as this gaming replaces that carried out through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have sued social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action claim, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state homeowners Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'prohibited sports betting business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as offenders in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We typically don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games throughout most of North America, as we have for more than a years, producing not only fantastic video games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to strongly protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The issues in between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos could show troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues wish to project a strong position against unlawful sports betting - particularly when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting supposedly unlawful gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a duty to describe to consumers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'A few of our worths are" our gamers come initially" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who lend their names to shady illegal gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton